header-logo header-logo

No fat left to chew

03 July 2009 / Carol Storer
Issue: 7376 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Raw economics, not lack of dedication, will force lawyers to consider their commitment to legal aid,
says Carol Storer

This year the Legal Aid Practitioners Group (LAPG) celebrates its silver jubilee. It might have been hoped that we would have disbanded by now. Twenty five years ago, when the Memorandum of Association was drafted, who would have thought that advancing and improving the provision of legal aid in England and Wales and the remuneration of legal aid practitioners would have needed so much time spent on it?

It seems to us that this summer and autumn are a watershed for practitioners. In the past, practitioners have continued because of their dedication to asserting and enforcing their clients’ rights and their belief in the importance of delivering legal aid work to clients who are often socially disadvantaged. Now, margins have been cut and bureaucracy continues to take up valuable time which could otherwise be used to deliver services. Management of contracts is always more time consuming when the profit margins are low and senior staff

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll