header-logo header-logo

29 October 2015
Issue: 7674 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

“No fault” divorce on Jersey?

The Jersey Law Commission has called for radical reform of the island’s divorce law.

In a report published this week, the commissioners call for a three-month fast-track divorce process where there is no dispute over children and finances.

The concept of “fault” would be removed from the process, under their recommendations, and court proceedings would be reserved for any issues that the couple could not resolve themselves. Reconciliation processes would be emphasised wherever possible, with alternative dispute resolution services offered to couples. Pre-nups and post-nups would be legally binding, and the current three-year waiting period before divorce can be started would be abolished.

Advocate Barbara Corbett, who led the project, says: “The Law Commission’s proposals support the institution of marriage and recommend ways in which marriage can be saved wherever possible. It should be possible to obtain a divorce without apportioning blame.”

Issue: 7674 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
back-to-top-scroll