header-logo header-logo

14 April 2019
Categories: Legal News , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

‘No-fault’ evictions to end

Lawyers have expressed concerns about government proposals to ban ‘no-fault’ evictions― including that it could cause rents to rise

The government announced proposals this week to repeal s 21 of the Housing Act 1988, which is used to obtain possession after a fixed-term assured shorthold tenancy ends or during a tenancy with no fixed end date. Once a s 21 notice is served, tenants have two months to vacate the premises.

Communities Secretary James Brokenshire said the government has evidence that some tenants avoid making complaints in case they are made subject to a ‘no-fault eviction’. He said: ‘We are making the biggest change to the private rental sector in a generation.’

Under the proposals, landlords would have to provide a ‘concrete, evidenced reason already specified in law’ to end the tenancy. Ministers will amend the s 8, Housing Act 1988 eviction process so that landlords can evict tenants if they want to sell the property or move into it themselves, and court processes will be ‘expedited’ to help landlords if their tenants fall into arrears or damage the property.

However, Joanne Young, legal director in Ashfords’ property litigation team, said: ‘No one can argue that there are some very poor practices by some private landlords, but this ignores the excellent private landlords who are providing great quality housing for tenants.

‘Those landlords, landlords I see on a day to day basis, do not use s 21 without good reason; it is used simply because it provides a means of obtaining possession that does not result in long court proceedings—proceedings that can have a significant financial impact on those landlords. Unless there are real improvements in the court process, I fear these proposals may be the final straw for many private landlords. I share the concerns that, in the long term, this may simply drive many landlords out of the market. I also suspect that the “rogue” element of landlords will continue as they do at present―with little regard to the law.’

James Browne, head of the property group at Lamb Chambers, said: ‘The government has not made it clear whether its proposed new grounds for possession where the landlord can prove he wants to sell the property or move into it himself will be mandatory or discretionary.

‘Nor is there any good reason to have confidence in the assurances given that the current possession procedure will be speeded up. Landlords routinely wait for two months between issuing a claim and a first hearing. The ongoing county court closure process and inadequate judicial recruitment leads to cases being block-listed at 10am and often not heard until late in the afternoon leading to delay and increased legal costs.

'The real risk for landlords, tenants and the government is that a poorly thought through reform will lead to many private sector landlords deciding to sell up and get out of the market. That will drive house prices down, which may be a desired by-product of the government’s proposed reforms. But it will not help renters. They will find that shortage of properties leads to increased private rents, and that the social housing sector will simply be unable cope with the increased demand placed on it.’

The Department of Housing, Communities & Local Government will launch a consultation on the proposals ‘shortly’.

 

Categories: Legal News , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll