header-logo header-logo

No judges, underpaid staff & crumbling buildings

27 April 2022
Issue: 7976 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Targets should be set for the length of time to complete certain criminal cases, such as rape, MPs have told ministers

In a devastating report published this week, ‘Court Capacity’, the Justice Committee sets out the impact of lengthy delays in disposing of cases on victims, defendants and justice professionals. The time taken from offence reported to ultimate completion has been rising since 2011 and increased during the pandemic by 77 days to a median length of 217 days, for Crown Court trials in Q4 2021.

The committee also urged the government to recruit more judges, pay court staff better, fix court buildings and continue the use of Nightingale courts in order to tackle the backlog of cases.

It warned the maintenance backlog in the court estate was a ‘serious problem’, with too many buildings in a poor condition, and called for a comprehensive plan to improve the quality of buildings. It praised the contribution of Nightingale courts to increasing capacity during the pandemic, and suggested this showed temporary courtrooms could be used in future while permanent buildings underwent essential work.

However, it cited the shortage of judges as ‘the most pressing constraint on the capacity of the courts’, and called for more judges to be recruited. Similarly, it warned shortages in HM Courts and Tribunals Service staff were also hampering capacity, and recommended pay levels keep up with equivalent roles in other departments.

The committee heard evidence that the Ministry of Justice is one of the most poorly paid departments and some employees could earn £3,000 more by transferring to an equivalent level role in another government department.

Chair of the Justice Committee Sir Bob Neill said: ‘The physical estate has been left to crumble for too long and must be made fit for purpose. There must be sufficient numbers of judicial and clerical staff to cope with the volume of cases. 

‘Understanding of the demand on courts needs to improve so that long-term planning can be based on an accurate picture of likely demand. Data should be collected of sufficient quality to allow long-term trends to be understood.’
Issue: 7976 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll