header-logo header-logo

26 September 2014 / Graham Lyons
Issue: 7623 / Categories: Opinion , Mediation , Family
printer mail-detail

No Minister!

lyons_cover_image

Graham Lyons shares his reservations about the future of mediation in an open letter to the Rt Hon Simon Hughes MP*

Dear Minister,

This open letter is in part a response to your recent letter (your ref: 13422), which outlined what the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) plans to do in response to the Family Mediation Task Force Report (TFR ) published in June. It is also partly a critique of what happens when a task force committee of 18 people dealing with family mediation has barely any full-time family mediators sitting on it. The letter I wrote to you in May about the abolition of the MoJ helpline was not acknowledged. Ditto my letter to the MoJ.

The TFR rightly looked at what can be done to increase awareness through the court forms. But why did it not produce recommendations regarding awareness of mediation among GPs, health personnel and Housing Departments?

The idea of a free first session is flawed. The first family mediation session is seldom a negotiating one. In our service

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll