header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
26 September 2014 / Graham Lyons
Issue: 7623 / Categories: Opinion , Mediation , Family
printer mail-detail

No Minister!

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
lyons_cover_image

Graham Lyons shares his reservations about the future of mediation in an open letter to the Rt Hon Simon Hughes MP*

Dear Minister,

This open letter is in part a response to your recent letter (your ref: 13422), which outlined what the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) plans to do in response to the Family Mediation Task Force Report (TFR ) published in June. It is also partly a critique of what happens when a task force committee of 18 people dealing with family mediation has barely any full-time family mediators sitting on it. The letter I wrote to you in May about the abolition of the MoJ helpline was not acknowledged. Ditto my letter to the MoJ.

The TFR rightly looked at what can be done to increase awareness through the court forms. But why did it not produce recommendations regarding awareness of mediation among GPs, health personnel and Housing Departments?

The idea of a free first session is flawed. The first family mediation session is seldom a negotiating one. In our service

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll