header-logo header-logo

No more Owens v Owens?

06 April 2022
Issue: 7974 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Profession
printer mail-detail
Tini Owens, whose high-profile divorce went all the way to the Supreme Court, has welcomed the new ‘no-fault’ process

She was denied a divorce since her husband, Hugh contested her petition and she was unable to show unreasonable behaviour, in Owens v Owens [2018] UKSC 41 [2018] 4 All ER 721.

Owens said: ‘No one should have to remain in a loveless marriage or endure a long, drawn out and expensive court battle to end it.’

Owens’ solicitor, Simon Beccle, partner at Payne Hicks Beach, welcomed the change but warned the reform did not introduce ‘quick divorce’.

‘The new law introduces a minimum period of 20 weeks between the start of the divorce proceedings and the application for a conditional order to provide spouses with a meaningful period of reflection and the chance to reconsider,’ he said. 

‘There will also be a six-week period between the conditional order and a final order of divorce.’ Therefore, divorce would take at least six months compared to three to four months under the old law.

Issue: 7974 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Sonya Sceats, the British Institute of International and Comparative Law

NLJ Career Profile: Sonya Sceats, the British Institute of International and Comparative Law

Sonya Sceats, next director and CEO of the British Institute of International and Comparative Law, discusses her long-standing mission to uphold and defend the rule of law

Anthony Collins—four appointments

Anthony Collins—four appointments

Property and commercial teams bolstered by senior hires

Keystone Law—Ben Knowles

Keystone Law—Ben Knowles

International arbitration specialist strenghtens the team

NEWS
Manchester’s online LLM has accelerated career progression for its graduates
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
back-to-top-scroll