header-logo header-logo

18 June 2009
Issue: 7374 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

No more worries for a week or 2

Employees have the right to accrue holiday while on sick leave, the House of Lords has ruled

Workers on sick leave are entitled to accrue statutory holiday pay, the law lords have ruled.

In HMRC v Stringer and others [2009] UKHL 31 five law lords interpreted the Working Time Directive 1998 to mean that workers on sick leave are also entitled to carry over unused holiday entitlement from one year to the next, and receive pay in lieu of any unused holiday entitlement at the end of their employment.

The unanimous House of Lords’ decision last week  is consistent with the European Court of Justice’s ruling on the case, in January.
Rachel Dineley, head of the diversity and discrimination unit at Beachcroft LLP, says the decision “may cost employers dearly”.

“Employers will need to assess the prospective liabilities they may have in respect of employees on long-term sick leave and the risks they now face of claims. This is far easier said than done,” she says. “The House of Lords has left a number of key questions unanswered. Only further case law will resolve some of these issues, which have been ongoing for several years already.”

Dineley warned against the temptation for some employers to resort to dismissing those on long-term sickness absence sooner rather than later, in order to limit those liabilities.

“There are very clear drawbacks in such an approach, not least being the requirements of the Disability Discrimination Act (and the proposed changes arising under the Equality Bill). Employers and insurers who provide income protection will wish to review the nature and extent of their cover in light of today’s decision.

“Whatever action they take, employers must be careful to follow the correct procedure or they could be faced with claims for unfair dismissal, disability discrimination and for loss of income protection benefits for their staff”.

Issue: 7374 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll