header-logo header-logo

No more worries for a week or 2

18 June 2009
Issue: 7374 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employees have the right to accrue holiday while on sick leave, the House of Lords has ruled

Workers on sick leave are entitled to accrue statutory holiday pay, the law lords have ruled.

In HMRC v Stringer and others [2009] UKHL 31 five law lords interpreted the Working Time Directive 1998 to mean that workers on sick leave are also entitled to carry over unused holiday entitlement from one year to the next, and receive pay in lieu of any unused holiday entitlement at the end of their employment.

The unanimous House of Lords’ decision last week  is consistent with the European Court of Justice’s ruling on the case, in January.
Rachel Dineley, head of the diversity and discrimination unit at Beachcroft LLP, says the decision “may cost employers dearly”.

“Employers will need to assess the prospective liabilities they may have in respect of employees on long-term sick leave and the risks they now face of claims. This is far easier said than done,” she says. “The House of Lords has left a number of key questions unanswered. Only further case law will resolve some of these issues, which have been ongoing for several years already.”

Dineley warned against the temptation for some employers to resort to dismissing those on long-term sickness absence sooner rather than later, in order to limit those liabilities.

“There are very clear drawbacks in such an approach, not least being the requirements of the Disability Discrimination Act (and the proposed changes arising under the Equality Bill). Employers and insurers who provide income protection will wish to review the nature and extent of their cover in light of today’s decision.

“Whatever action they take, employers must be careful to follow the correct procedure or they could be faced with claims for unfair dismissal, disability discrimination and for loss of income protection benefits for their staff”.

Issue: 7374 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll