header-logo header-logo

05 February 2015
Issue: 7639 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

No need for new terror scrutiny board

The Bar Council has taken issue with government proposals to create a UK Privacy and Civil Liberties Board to scrutinise terror legislation.

The proposal for the Board is set out in the Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill—a Home Office consultation on the proposal closed last week.

However, Alistair MacDonald QC, Bar chair, points out that there already exists an independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, David Anderson QC, whose job is to scrutinise terror laws in light of civil liberties and privacy concerns. He says removing restrictions on Anderson so he could review all relevant terror laws would be cheaper than creating a new Board, which would cost an estimated £800,000 to run per year.says

MacDonald argues that setting up an additional board would “generate confusion and undermine rather than reinforce public understanding of the process”.

Issue: 7639 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Hugo Plowman, Mishcon de Reya

NLJ Career Profile: Hugo Plowman, Mishcon de Reya

From global fraud cases to fishing off-grid, Mishcon de Reya’s chair of dispute resolution Hugo Plowman discusses mentors, management switching off

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec, Ciara Florey, Alice Ferguson & Ruth Wynn

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec, Ciara Florey, Alice Ferguson & Ruth Wynn

Maguire Family Law announces partner promotion and new hires amid a record year for enquiries

Switalskis—Rebecca Parry & Hannah Gamble

Switalskis—Rebecca Parry & Hannah Gamble

Switalskis wills and probate team extends reach with two appointments

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll