header-logo header-logo

No place to hide?

02 March 2012 / Phillip Morgan
Issue: 7503 / Categories: Opinion , Media
printer mail-detail

Phillip Morgan reports on striking a balance between law, tactics & the media

Lawyers and insurers often think with blinkers, unaware of how their actions will be portrayed by the press. A good tactical decision in litigation can be a major public relations disaster. All major concerns should take care over their media profile. The media controls public perceptions, it is a tool used by pressure groups, campaigners, marketers, and politicians alike to exert influence and to weaken their opponents by ensuring that it is their message that dominates. The importance of influence and the media is now a significant consideration in any military campaign. In making litigation decisions, lawyers should consider the media coverage of their course of conduct and its impact on their client. Where possible, they should ensure that their conduct of the case, when reported by the media, is not open to manipulation by opponents, or portrayed in a significantly negative fashion.

A case in point

The media coverage of JGE v The Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll