header-logo header-logo

07 April 2016
Issue: 7693 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

No sanction after seven-day delay

Relief from sanctions has been granted to a law firm which filed its costs budget seven days late.

Sitting in Liverpool County Court, Judge Peter Gregory held that the district judge had been wrong to refuse relief in Murray v BAE Systems, a personal injury case. Thompsons, for the claimant, explained the delay was a genuine mistake due to poor communications between the solicitor involved and her predecessor.

District Judge Harrison had considered the delay both serious and significant. DAC Beachcroft, for the defendant, argued the length of delay distinguished the case from other cases where relief was granted.

Gordon Exall, of Zenith Chambers, acting for the claimant, countered that the judge had not properly addressed the materiality and significance of the breach since there was no knock-on effect to the timetable, as in the landmark sanctions case of Mitchell.

Judge Gregory said DH Harrison “should have given consideration to whereabouts, upon the scale of seriousness and significance, this case properly lies”.

 
Issue: 7693 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll