header-logo header-logo

No sanction after seven-day delay

07 April 2016
Issue: 7693 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Relief from sanctions has been granted to a law firm which filed its costs budget seven days late.

Sitting in Liverpool County Court, Judge Peter Gregory held that the district judge had been wrong to refuse relief in Murray v BAE Systems, a personal injury case. Thompsons, for the claimant, explained the delay was a genuine mistake due to poor communications between the solicitor involved and her predecessor.

District Judge Harrison had considered the delay both serious and significant. DAC Beachcroft, for the defendant, argued the length of delay distinguished the case from other cases where relief was granted.

Gordon Exall, of Zenith Chambers, acting for the claimant, countered that the judge had not properly addressed the materiality and significance of the breach since there was no knock-on effect to the timetable, as in the landmark sanctions case of Mitchell.

Judge Gregory said DH Harrison “should have given consideration to whereabouts, upon the scale of seriousness and significance, this case properly lies”.

 
Issue: 7693 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll