header-logo header-logo

No second chances

24 November 2011 / Claire Sanders
Issue: 7491 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Child law , Family , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

In what circumstances can a family court issue a second committal order for contempt, asks Claire Sanders

In family proceedings, committal orders are orders of last resort to be avoided wherever there is a reasonable alternative available instead. The purpose of such proceedings is to mark the courts disapproval of disobeying its orders and to secure future compliance.The powers of the court to deal with contempt are set out in the Contempt of Court Act 1981 (CCA 1981), in particular, s 14(1), under which the court may commit a person to prison for contempt for a maximum term of two years. 

 
In a case where the respondent has already served the maximum sentence of imprisonment for breaching a previous order can the court impose a further sentence of imprisonment for contempt? That was the issue in Re W (a child) (abduction: committal) [2011] 1 All ER (D) 83 (Aug).

Facts

The parties, who were never married, had a child aged four and a half who lived with the mother
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll