header-logo header-logo

24 November 2011 / Claire Sanders
Issue: 7491 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Child law , Family , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

No second chances

In what circumstances can a family court issue a second committal order for contempt, asks Claire Sanders

In family proceedings, committal orders are orders of last resort to be avoided wherever there is a reasonable alternative available instead. The purpose of such proceedings is to mark the courts disapproval of disobeying its orders and to secure future compliance.The powers of the court to deal with contempt are set out in the Contempt of Court Act 1981 (CCA 1981), in particular, s 14(1), under which the court may commit a person to prison for contempt for a maximum term of two years. 

 
In a case where the respondent has already served the maximum sentence of imprisonment for breaching a previous order can the court impose a further sentence of imprisonment for contempt? That was the issue in Re W (a child) (abduction: committal) [2011] 1 All ER (D) 83 (Aug).

Facts

The parties, who were never married, had a child aged four and a half who lived with the
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll