header-logo header-logo

No second chances

24 November 2011 / Claire Sanders
Issue: 7491 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Child law , Family , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

In what circumstances can a family court issue a second committal order for contempt, asks Claire Sanders

In family proceedings, committal orders are orders of last resort to be avoided wherever there is a reasonable alternative available instead. The purpose of such proceedings is to mark the courts disapproval of disobeying its orders and to secure future compliance.The powers of the court to deal with contempt are set out in the Contempt of Court Act 1981 (CCA 1981), in particular, s 14(1), under which the court may commit a person to prison for contempt for a maximum term of two years. 

 
In a case where the respondent has already served the maximum sentence of imprisonment for breaching a previous order can the court impose a further sentence of imprisonment for contempt? That was the issue in Re W (a child) (abduction: committal) [2011] 1 All ER (D) 83 (Aug).

Facts

The parties, who were never married, had a child aged four and a half who lived with the mother
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
In this week's NLJ, Steven Ball of Red Lion Chambers unpacks how advances in forensic science finally unmasked Ryland Headley, jailed in 2025 for the 1967 rape and murder of 75-year-old Louisa Dunne. Preserved swabs and palm prints lay dormant for decades until DNA-17 profiling produced a billion-to-one match
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
back-to-top-scroll