header-logo header-logo

24 November 2011 / Claire Sanders
Issue: 7491 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Child law , Family , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

No second chances

In what circumstances can a family court issue a second committal order for contempt, asks Claire Sanders

In family proceedings, committal orders are orders of last resort to be avoided wherever there is a reasonable alternative available instead. The purpose of such proceedings is to mark the courts disapproval of disobeying its orders and to secure future compliance.The powers of the court to deal with contempt are set out in the Contempt of Court Act 1981 (CCA 1981), in particular, s 14(1), under which the court may commit a person to prison for contempt for a maximum term of two years. 

 
In a case where the respondent has already served the maximum sentence of imprisonment for breaching a previous order can the court impose a further sentence of imprisonment for contempt? That was the issue in Re W (a child) (abduction: committal) [2011] 1 All ER (D) 83 (Aug).

Facts

The parties, who were never married, had a child aged four and a half who lived with the
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll