header-logo header-logo

No through road

16 April 2015 / Nicholas Bevan
Issue: 7648 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail
nlj_april_17_bevan

Nicholas Bevan explains why Delaney is a game changer

In Delaney v Secretary of State for Transport [2015] EWCA Civ 172, the Court of Appeal upheld Mr Justice Jay’s strident finding that the UK government was liable to compensate a seriously injured car passenger for his injuries. Its liability was due to the failure by successive governments to extend adequate compensatory protection to third party victims, as required under European law.

Empty victory

This Francovich action arose out of an earlier claim by Sean Delaney against his driver (Shane Pickett) and the vehicle’s motor insurers (Tradewise). It proved to be something of an empty victory. Although the driver admitted full responsibility for the accident, he was not the main target. Delaney’s only hope of recovering his extensive compensatory needs depended on his establishing that Tradewise was also liable to compensate him: either directly under s 151 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (RTA 1988), or indirectly as agents of the Motor Insurance Bureau (MIB) under the terms of the Uninsured Drivers Agreement 1999.

Delaney’s first

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll