header-logo header-logo

16 April 2015 / Nicholas Bevan
Issue: 7648 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

No through road

nlj_april_17_bevan

Nicholas Bevan explains why Delaney is a game changer

In Delaney v Secretary of State for Transport [2015] EWCA Civ 172, the Court of Appeal upheld Mr Justice Jay’s strident finding that the UK government was liable to compensate a seriously injured car passenger for his injuries. Its liability was due to the failure by successive governments to extend adequate compensatory protection to third party victims, as required under European law.

Empty victory

This Francovich action arose out of an earlier claim by Sean Delaney against his driver (Shane Pickett) and the vehicle’s motor insurers (Tradewise). It proved to be something of an empty victory. Although the driver admitted full responsibility for the accident, he was not the main target. Delaney’s only hope of recovering his extensive compensatory needs depended on his establishing that Tradewise was also liable to compensate him: either directly under s 151 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (RTA 1988), or indirectly as agents of the Motor Insurance Bureau (MIB) under the terms of the Uninsured Drivers Agreement 1999.

Delaney’s first

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Ashurst's Chief Risk Officer joins Walkers

Excello Law—John Osborne

Excello Law—John Osborne

Northern family lawyer John Osborne joins Excello

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

Trio of promotions announced at Kidderminster law firm mfg Solicitors

NEWS
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
A sole director can conspire with their own company for the purposes of the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, the High Court has ruled in a judgment with potentially wide implications for business disputes
The Court of Appeal has reinforced that domicile depends on intention rather than residence alone, in a significant post-Brexit ruling on cross-border financial remedy claims
The Chancery Division's long history comes to an end this autumn as it is reborn as the Business and Property Division, prompting questions over whether the shake-up is really necessary
back-to-top-scroll