header-logo header-logo

No through road

16 April 2015 / Nicholas Bevan
Issue: 7648 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail
nlj_april_17_bevan

Nicholas Bevan explains why Delaney is a game changer

In Delaney v Secretary of State for Transport [2015] EWCA Civ 172, the Court of Appeal upheld Mr Justice Jay’s strident finding that the UK government was liable to compensate a seriously injured car passenger for his injuries. Its liability was due to the failure by successive governments to extend adequate compensatory protection to third party victims, as required under European law.

Empty victory

This Francovich action arose out of an earlier claim by Sean Delaney against his driver (Shane Pickett) and the vehicle’s motor insurers (Tradewise). It proved to be something of an empty victory. Although the driver admitted full responsibility for the accident, he was not the main target. Delaney’s only hope of recovering his extensive compensatory needs depended on his establishing that Tradewise was also liable to compensate him: either directly under s 151 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (RTA 1988), or indirectly as agents of the Motor Insurance Bureau (MIB) under the terms of the Uninsured Drivers Agreement 1999.

Delaney’s first

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll