header-logo header-logo

14 May 2025
Issue: 8116 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Health , Compensation , Inheritance tax
printer mail-detail

No to unfair tax on compensation for infected blood families

Lawyers have uncovered a major inheritance tax oversight affecting thousands of families of victims of the infected blood scandal

More than 30,000 people in the UK were infected with HIV and hepatitis C after being given contaminated blood products in the 1970s and 1980s. The Infected Blood Inquiry published its final report last year, and the government has so far allocated £11.8bn in compensation. Due to the length of time that has passed, however, many of the people due compensation have since died.

At a special hearing of the inquiry last week, the inquiry’s chair, Sir Brian Langstaff heard only 106 people have received payments so far, with a further 54 receiving offers. About 140,000 victims, including bereaved parents, children, and siblings are still waiting for compensation.

The Association of Lifetime Lawyers (ALL) and STEP are now campaigning for legislation to stop HM Revenue and Customs seizing a sizeable proportion of the payments.

They explain that, while HMRC has pledged not to levy inheritance tax on the compensation, the payments are now going to deceased victims’ estates and will be taxed when passed on to someone else—a situation known as a ‘secondary transfer’.

Jade Gani, lawyer and spokesperson for ALL and STEP, said: ‘While working with a family that was affected by the infected blood scandal, I identified that they and others may now face a secondary injustice with an unfair and unexpected tax on their compensation.

‘We’re currently in talks with HMRC and are grateful for their ongoing engagement, responsiveness and proactive efforts in addressing the inheritance tax implications for families affected by the Infected Blood scandal.’

ALL, STEP and Ten Old Square chambers are working with HMRC to draft legislation to address the secondary transfer issue.

Gani said: We are encouraged by the progress being made so far, and are hopeful that legislative change will bring about a fair and compassionate resolution.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll