header-logo header-logo

17 July 2008 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7330 / Categories: Features , EU
printer mail-detail

No=Maybe=Yes

Seamus Burns considers whether or not the Irish “no vote” means the Lisbon Treaty is confirmed dead

The rejection of the Lisbon Treaty, (LT) by the voters of the Republic of Ireland on 12 June 2008 can be interpreted as a total and final repudiation of LT with the juggernaut of ever-increasing EU integration being derailed, or alternatively viewed as merely an inconvenient red stop signal halting only temporarily the EU train on its relentless one-way journey to the federal EU superstate called Europe.

Background

The Lisbon Treaty was signed by the governments of the 27 member states of the EU in December 2007. LT had been created and designed to replace the draft European Constitution, which itself had been rejected by the voters of France and Holland in referendums held in both countries in 2005. Each of the 27 member states had to then subsequently ratify the LT before it came into force. Moreover, under EU rules all 27 member states had to ratify LT before it became effective, thus in essence conferring a veto

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll