header-logo header-logo

17 July 2008 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7330 / Categories: Features , EU
printer mail-detail

No=Maybe=Yes

Seamus Burns considers whether or not the Irish “no vote” means the Lisbon Treaty is confirmed dead

The rejection of the Lisbon Treaty, (LT) by the voters of the Republic of Ireland on 12 June 2008 can be interpreted as a total and final repudiation of LT with the juggernaut of ever-increasing EU integration being derailed, or alternatively viewed as merely an inconvenient red stop signal halting only temporarily the EU train on its relentless one-way journey to the federal EU superstate called Europe.

Background

The Lisbon Treaty was signed by the governments of the 27 member states of the EU in December 2007. LT had been created and designed to replace the draft European Constitution, which itself had been rejected by the voters of France and Holland in referendums held in both countries in 2005. Each of the 27 member states had to then subsequently ratify the LT before it came into force. Moreover, under EU rules all 27 member states had to ratify LT before it became effective, thus in essence conferring a veto

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll