header-logo header-logo

Non-lawyer to head new legal regulator

15 November 2007
Issue: 7297 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

News

The inaugural head of the Legal Services Board (LSB) will not be a lawyer.
Members of the legal profession are barred from applying for the £63,000-a-year post, after consumer organisations convinced the government that an internal appointment could lead to conflicts of interest.

Bar Council chairman Geoffrey Vos QC says he would have preferred a situation where the best candidate, lawyer or non-lawyer, was appointed.
However, he accepts that the decision will not damage the operation of the new regulatory structure, provided the person appointed has the “necessary experience and objectivity” to command the respect and confidence of the public and the legal profession.

The part-time appointment, which marks the end of self-regulation of the legal profession, also involves overseeing the creation of the Office for Legal Complaints.

The new recruit will have to ensure that the LSB is seen as fair and transparent and Vos believes that a non-lawyer is ideally placed to ensure that this occurs.

“A distinguished non-lawyer will be able to lead the new board effectively, and ensure that it acts as the light touch oversight regulator that the legislation intends it to be,” he says.

Issue: 7297 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll