header-logo header-logo

Norwich Pharmacal orders: still in vogue?

16 June 2017 / Jonathan Cohen
Issue: 7750 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
nlj_7750_cohen

Flexible & adaptable to many situations, the Norwich Pharmacal order remains as useful as ever, says Jonathan Cohen

  • Norwich Pharmacal orders for disclosure are granted against third parties innocently caught up in wrongdoing.
  • They have widespread application and have been further developed in case law.

A Norwich Pharmacal order may be an old remedy, but it still has modern application. Its use in the past three years alone demonstrates its continuing flexibility. Norwich Pharmacal orders are court orders to disclose information or documents, granted against third parties who have become mixed up in wrongdoing through no fault of their own. They date back to a 1974 House of Lords case concerning the Norwich Pharmaceutical Company, Norwich Pharmacal v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] 2 All ER 943.

The case

Norwich Pharmacal was the victim of a patent infringement. It knew 30 consignments of the compound, Furazolidone, which was covered by its patent, had been imported into the UK without licence and therefore in breach of its

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll