header-logo header-logo

02 May 2013 / Anita Killeen
Issue: 7558 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Not guilty? Fat chance!

72919754_largefinal

Does body weight influence perceptions of responsibility, asks Anita Killeen

Researchers at Yale University have shown that a defendant’s body weight and gender can affect perceptions of guilt and responsibility. In addition the authors state that the prevalence of weight discrimination has increased worldwide by 66% since 1995 and is now on par with rates of racial discrimination.

Although “weight bias” has been documented across multiple domains, including employment, medical, and interpersonal settings, these findings  go further, highlighting the importance of increasing awareness to prevent such discrimination in legal settings. The research has relevance for all litigators, not just criminal law practitioners, as any trial where an obese client or witness is involved, such as defamation cases, health and safety cases, and employment cases, may be affected (see NA Schvey, RM Puhl, KA Levandoski and KD Brownwell, International Journal of Obesity (2013), 1:1-7).

A brief history of bias

Previous empirical research in both simulated and actual trial settings has indicated that bias does exist in the courtroom. For example, physically attractive defendants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll