header-logo header-logo

14 August 2013 / Stephen Boyd
Issue: 7573 / Categories: Opinion , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

Not in my name

rihanna

Stephen Boyd debates image rights & wrongs

“Whatever may be the position elsewhere in the world...there is today in England no such thing as a free standing general right by a famous person (or anyone else) to control the reproduction of their image” (Birss J, Fenty and others v Arcadia Group and another [2013] EWHC 2310 (Ch) (Rihanna v Topshop).

The utilty of passing off as a cause of action to be deployed by a celebrity whose image had been exploited without consent was brought to the fore by Irvine and another v Talksport Ltd [2002] EWHC 367 (Ch). Eddie Irvine was a well-known Formula One driver. In 1999 Talksport embarked on a special promotional campaign to mark the rebranding of the station from Talk Radio to Talksport. It sent out to media buyers a flyer bearing a photograph of Irvine. The original photograph, which showed the driver holding a mobile phone, had been manipulated to replace the mobile phone with a radio to which the words “Talk Radio” had

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll