header-logo header-logo

Not in my name

14 August 2013 / Stephen Boyd
Issue: 7573 / Categories: Opinion , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail
rihanna

Stephen Boyd debates image rights & wrongs

“Whatever may be the position elsewhere in the world...there is today in England no such thing as a free standing general right by a famous person (or anyone else) to control the reproduction of their image” (Birss J, Fenty and others v Arcadia Group and another [2013] EWHC 2310 (Ch) (Rihanna v Topshop).

The utilty of passing off as a cause of action to be deployed by a celebrity whose image had been exploited without consent was brought to the fore by Irvine and another v Talksport Ltd [2002] EWHC 367 (Ch). Eddie Irvine was a well-known Formula One driver. In 1999 Talksport embarked on a special promotional campaign to mark the rebranding of the station from Talk Radio to Talksport. It sent out to media buyers a flyer bearing a photograph of Irvine. The original photograph, which showed the driver holding a mobile phone, had been manipulated to replace the mobile phone with a radio to which the words “Talk Radio” had

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll