header-logo header-logo

Not so catastrophic?

11 March 2010 / Christopher Sharp KC
Issue: 7408 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Christopher Sharp QC reports on Cobham Hire Services Ltd v Eeles: a year on

Part 25 of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) makes provision for interim payments. This provision is frequently employed in personal injury claims, especially in claims for substantial damages arising out of catastrophic injuries, where immediate funding is required ahead of the final quantification of the claim for adapted housing, equipment, or expensive care regimes.

Frequently such provision is in the interests of both parties as early rehabilitation and the provision of appropriate housing, therapy and support will have a beneficial effect on the claimant’s recovery and may reduce the long-term cost of care. This is the principle which underlies the Rehabilitation Code and it makes sense for insurers and for claimants alike.
However, by virtue of the Damages Act 1996 s 2, a court awarding damages for future pecuniary loss in respect of personal injury, not only “may order that the damages are wholly or partly to take the form of periodical payment” but also “shall consider whether to make

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll