header-logo header-logo

11 March 2010 / Christopher Sharp KC
Issue: 7408 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Not so catastrophic?

Christopher Sharp QC reports on Cobham Hire Services Ltd v Eeles: a year on

Part 25 of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) makes provision for interim payments. This provision is frequently employed in personal injury claims, especially in claims for substantial damages arising out of catastrophic injuries, where immediate funding is required ahead of the final quantification of the claim for adapted housing, equipment, or expensive care regimes.

Frequently such provision is in the interests of both parties as early rehabilitation and the provision of appropriate housing, therapy and support will have a beneficial effect on the claimant’s recovery and may reduce the long-term cost of care. This is the principle which underlies the Rehabilitation Code and it makes sense for insurers and for claimants alike.
However, by virtue of the Damages Act 1996 s 2, a court awarding damages for future pecuniary loss in respect of personal injury, not only “may order that the damages are wholly or partly to take the form of periodical payment” but also “shall consider whether to make

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll