header-logo header-logo

Not so confidential?

10 June 2010 / Ashton Davies
Issue: 7421 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

Ashton Davies outlines how to respond to information requests

One of the first steps to be taken by a party when conducting investigations into the validity of a will is to request information from the solicitor who was involved in the taking of instructions, the preparation and the execution of that will. These requests are increasingly common in light of the significant rise in contentious probate matters. Solicitors and will drafters can sometimes adopt a defensive position upon receipt of the request for information, but before doing so they should bear in mind the Law Society’s recommendation that the testator’s solicitor should make available a statement of his evidence regarding instructions for the preparation and execution of the will and the surrounding circumstances. This recommendation, made in 1959, was later endorsed by the Court of Appeal in Larke v Nugus [1979] 123 Sol Jo 337 and consequently these requests for information are commonly referred to as Larke v Nugus requests.

More recently the issue has been the subject of a specific Law Society Practice

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll