header-logo header-logo

Not so confidential?

10 June 2010 / Ashton Davies
Issue: 7421 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

Ashton Davies outlines how to respond to information requests

One of the first steps to be taken by a party when conducting investigations into the validity of a will is to request information from the solicitor who was involved in the taking of instructions, the preparation and the execution of that will. These requests are increasingly common in light of the significant rise in contentious probate matters. Solicitors and will drafters can sometimes adopt a defensive position upon receipt of the request for information, but before doing so they should bear in mind the Law Society’s recommendation that the testator’s solicitor should make available a statement of his evidence regarding instructions for the preparation and execution of the will and the surrounding circumstances. This recommendation, made in 1959, was later endorsed by the Court of Appeal in Larke v Nugus [1979] 123 Sol Jo 337 and consequently these requests for information are commonly referred to as Larke v Nugus requests.

More recently the issue has been the subject of a specific Law Society Practice

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll