header-logo header-logo

10 June 2010 / Ashton Davies
Issue: 7421 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

Not so confidential?

Ashton Davies outlines how to respond to information requests

One of the first steps to be taken by a party when conducting investigations into the validity of a will is to request information from the solicitor who was involved in the taking of instructions, the preparation and the execution of that will. These requests are increasingly common in light of the significant rise in contentious probate matters. Solicitors and will drafters can sometimes adopt a defensive position upon receipt of the request for information, but before doing so they should bear in mind the Law Society’s recommendation that the testator’s solicitor should make available a statement of his evidence regarding instructions for the preparation and execution of the will and the surrounding circumstances. This recommendation, made in 1959, was later endorsed by the Court of Appeal in Larke v Nugus [1979] 123 Sol Jo 337 and consequently these requests for information are commonly referred to as Larke v Nugus requests.

More recently the issue has been the subject of a specific Law Society Practice

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll