header-logo header-logo

Not so confidential?

10 June 2010 / Ashton Davies
Issue: 7421 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

Ashton Davies outlines how to respond to information requests

One of the first steps to be taken by a party when conducting investigations into the validity of a will is to request information from the solicitor who was involved in the taking of instructions, the preparation and the execution of that will. These requests are increasingly common in light of the significant rise in contentious probate matters. Solicitors and will drafters can sometimes adopt a defensive position upon receipt of the request for information, but before doing so they should bear in mind the Law Society’s recommendation that the testator’s solicitor should make available a statement of his evidence regarding instructions for the preparation and execution of the will and the surrounding circumstances. This recommendation, made in 1959, was later endorsed by the Court of Appeal in Larke v Nugus [1979] 123 Sol Jo 337 and consequently these requests for information are commonly referred to as Larke v Nugus requests.

More recently the issue has been the subject of a specific Law Society Practice

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll