header-logo header-logo

Nothing unusual about no-fault divorce

20 March 2019
Issue: 7833 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Family lawyers’ calls for no-fault divorce are consistent with international trends, according to a report by the Nuffield Foundation.

The report, Reforming the ground for divorce, highlights ‘a broad shift away from fault towards entitlement to divorce, based on the wish of one, or both, parties or following a period of separation’. Written by Dr Jens M Scherpe, Cambridge University, and Professor Liz Trinder, Exeter University, it looks at divorce law reform in eight jurisdictions: Australia, California, Colorado, Finland, Germany, New Zealand, Spain and Sweden.

One recommendation is to reduce the three-step English process to a two-step process, which will make it less complicated for litigants in person. 

Jo Edwards, chair of Resolution’s Family Law Reform Group, said the research ‘provides yet more evidence of the need for change by highlighting global trends moving away from a fault-based approach to divorce.

‘Resolution has long campaigned for a kinder divorce system and an end to the need to apportion blame in divorce, which we know can have a significant adverse impact on children. We welcome this further report and look forward to working with government going forward, following their consultation last autumn on their plans to modernise the divorce system and bring it in line with other jurisdictions across the world.’

Issue: 7833 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll