header-logo header-logo

20 March 2019
Issue: 7833 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Nothing unusual about no-fault divorce

Family lawyers’ calls for no-fault divorce are consistent with international trends, according to a report by the Nuffield Foundation.

The report, Reforming the ground for divorce, highlights ‘a broad shift away from fault towards entitlement to divorce, based on the wish of one, or both, parties or following a period of separation’. Written by Dr Jens M Scherpe, Cambridge University, and Professor Liz Trinder, Exeter University, it looks at divorce law reform in eight jurisdictions: Australia, California, Colorado, Finland, Germany, New Zealand, Spain and Sweden.

One recommendation is to reduce the three-step English process to a two-step process, which will make it less complicated for litigants in person. 

Jo Edwards, chair of Resolution’s Family Law Reform Group, said the research ‘provides yet more evidence of the need for change by highlighting global trends moving away from a fault-based approach to divorce.

‘Resolution has long campaigned for a kinder divorce system and an end to the need to apportion blame in divorce, which we know can have a significant adverse impact on children. We welcome this further report and look forward to working with government going forward, following their consultation last autumn on their plans to modernise the divorce system and bring it in line with other jurisdictions across the world.’

Issue: 7833 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll