header-logo header-logo

Nothing unusual about no-fault divorce

20 March 2019
Issue: 7833 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Family lawyers’ calls for no-fault divorce are consistent with international trends, according to a report by the Nuffield Foundation.

The report, Reforming the ground for divorce, highlights ‘a broad shift away from fault towards entitlement to divorce, based on the wish of one, or both, parties or following a period of separation’. Written by Dr Jens M Scherpe, Cambridge University, and Professor Liz Trinder, Exeter University, it looks at divorce law reform in eight jurisdictions: Australia, California, Colorado, Finland, Germany, New Zealand, Spain and Sweden.

One recommendation is to reduce the three-step English process to a two-step process, which will make it less complicated for litigants in person. 

Jo Edwards, chair of Resolution’s Family Law Reform Group, said the research ‘provides yet more evidence of the need for change by highlighting global trends moving away from a fault-based approach to divorce.

‘Resolution has long campaigned for a kinder divorce system and an end to the need to apportion blame in divorce, which we know can have a significant adverse impact on children. We welcome this further report and look forward to working with government going forward, following their consultation last autumn on their plans to modernise the divorce system and bring it in line with other jurisdictions across the world.’

Issue: 7833 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll