header-logo header-logo

19 March 2009 / Claire Andrews
Issue: 7361 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Now for the next Act

Claire Andrews navigates the Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Act 2008

Consumer and food law, with its origins in weights and measures and food legislation dating from Magna Carta and beyond, has traditionally used punishment to deter breach of regulatory standards. In history, death, fines, flogging, the pillory, imprisonment and excommunication have featured variously as punishments for, and therefore deterrents against, certain offences of selling short weight or adulteration of food.

Limited powers

Today's powers to enforce consumer protection, food safety and hygiene laws are more limited. Personified by the modern-day weights and measures inspector—the trading standards officer—and his colleague the environmental health practitioner, local authority regulatory services have continued to enjoy powers which focus on punishment and deterrent through criminal sanctions. Prior to the Enterprise Act 2002 (and its predecessor, the Stop Now Orders (EC Directive) Regulations 2001), enforcement involved prosecuting off enders, cautioning them or taking informal or no action, and in some types of case, limited powers to prevent the off ending activity, including suspension or forfeiture.

The shift from

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll