header-logo header-logo

Now for the next Act

19 March 2009 / Claire Andrews
Issue: 7361 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Claire Andrews navigates the Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Act 2008

Consumer and food law, with its origins in weights and measures and food legislation dating from Magna Carta and beyond, has traditionally used punishment to deter breach of regulatory standards. In history, death, fines, flogging, the pillory, imprisonment and excommunication have featured variously as punishments for, and therefore deterrents against, certain offences of selling short weight or adulteration of food.

Limited powers

Today's powers to enforce consumer protection, food safety and hygiene laws are more limited. Personified by the modern-day weights and measures inspector—the trading standards officer—and his colleague the environmental health practitioner, local authority regulatory services have continued to enjoy powers which focus on punishment and deterrent through criminal sanctions. Prior to the Enterprise Act 2002 (and its predecessor, the Stop Now Orders (EC Directive) Regulations 2001), enforcement involved prosecuting off enders, cautioning them or taking informal or no action, and in some types of case, limited powers to prevent the off ending activity, including suspension or forfeiture.

The shift from

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Lawyers can no longer afford to ignore the metaverse, says Jacqueline Watts of Allin1 Advisory in this week's NLJ. Far from being a passing tech fad, virtual platforms like Roblox host thriving economies and social interactions, raising real legal issues
back-to-top-scroll