header-logo header-logo

19 March 2009 / Claire Andrews
Issue: 7361 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Now for the next Act

Claire Andrews navigates the Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Act 2008

Consumer and food law, with its origins in weights and measures and food legislation dating from Magna Carta and beyond, has traditionally used punishment to deter breach of regulatory standards. In history, death, fines, flogging, the pillory, imprisonment and excommunication have featured variously as punishments for, and therefore deterrents against, certain offences of selling short weight or adulteration of food.

Limited powers

Today's powers to enforce consumer protection, food safety and hygiene laws are more limited. Personified by the modern-day weights and measures inspector—the trading standards officer—and his colleague the environmental health practitioner, local authority regulatory services have continued to enjoy powers which focus on punishment and deterrent through criminal sanctions. Prior to the Enterprise Act 2002 (and its predecessor, the Stop Now Orders (EC Directive) Regulations 2001), enforcement involved prosecuting off enders, cautioning them or taking informal or no action, and in some types of case, limited powers to prevent the off ending activity, including suspension or forfeiture.

The shift from

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll