header-logo header-logo

03 May 2012 / Roger Harris
Issue: 7512 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Nuclear fallout

Roger Harris follows the plight of personal injury claimants

The “atomic veterans” litigation reached its climax with the decision of the Supreme Court in AB & Others v Ministry of Defence [2012] UKSC 9, [2012] All ER (D) 108 (Mar). The claimants represented over 1,000 veteran servicemen who had been involved in thermonuclear tests carried out by the Ministry of Defence (MoD) in the South Pacific in the 1950s. Their case was that they had been exposed to radiation during the course of this testing and had subsequently developed injuries as a result of their exposure. Limitation was tried as a preliminary issue. There were issues both as to date of knowledge under s 14 of the Limitation Act 1980 and whether the court should exercise its discretion under s 33 of the Act.

Bizarre situation

The conundrum in AB was that the MoD maintained for the purposes of s 33 that the claimants’ case on causation was so weak that it had no real prospect of success, yet for the purposes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll