header-logo header-logo

19 December 2014
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Obesity can be a disability

A ruling that obesity may amount to a disability in certain circumstances for the purposes of employment law is “not surprising”, an employment lawyer has said.

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has backed an earlier Advocate General’s Opinion that obesity can in severe cases be classified as a disability, in a Danish case involving a morbidly obese man who was dismissed from his job as a childminder, Kaltoft v Municipality of Billund.

The Advocate General had rejected the argument that discrimination on grounds of obesity is unlawful in itself, but considered that it might be a disability where it “hinders full and effective participation in professional life on an equal basis with other workers”. The question of whether or not obesity is self-inflicted was dismissed as irrelevant.

Tina Wisener, employment partner at Doyle Clayton, says: “Whether a person is disabled will depend on whether their obesity gives rise to a physical or mental impairment and whether it affects their ability to participate in employment on an equal basis with other workers on a long term basis, for example because of reduced mobility or the onset of medical conditions associated with obesity.   

“For many people, their obesity does not affect their work in any sense and employers would not be expected or obliged to make any adjustments for them as they would not be considered disabled. The judgment does not really add anything to what employers already knew.

“The Advocate General suggested that those classified as WHO Class 111 obese are likely to be disabled. Although the ECJ did not make any similar comment, the key issue will always be the effect the obesity has on the ability to work on an equal footing with others. There is therefore no need to define the level of obesity which will result in someone being classed as disabled.”

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Firm expands in London and Leeds with dual merger

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Private wealth and real estate firmpromotes two to partner and five to senior associate

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Agile firm expands employment team with two partner hires

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll