header-logo header-logo

16 April 2015
Issue: 7648 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Obesity discrimination risk

Employers routinely discriminate against obese workers and are unaware of obesity and disability-related laws, research by a law firm has found.

In a survey of 1,000 employers with hiring responsibilities, by Crossland Employment Solicitors, nearly half were less inclined to recruit an obese applicant at interview. Employers described obese applicants as “lazy” and believed they would be unable to do the job.

Some 61% expressed concern about the potential cost of accommodating overweight staff, while 63% feared being taken to court on grounds of discrimination if they didn’t meet the obese person’s needs.

Employers also showed a lack of awareness of the law—more than half were unaware that obese applicants who tell them about their long term conditions at interview can then try to claim disability discrimination if they are not hired on the basis of their obesity.

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) recently ruled that obesity may be a disability if it causes a long-term impairment, in the case of Karsten Kaltoft v Kommunernes Landsforerning C-354/13.

Beverley Sunderland, managing director at Crossland, says: “Our research shows just how less inclined employers are to recruit obese applicants following the case of Mr Kaltoft, the overweight childminder in Denmark and the ECJ ruling.

“It also demonstrates that organisations do need to be more careful at every stage of recruitment and retention of employees, as discrimination law warns us against making ‘stereotypical assumptions’ and doing so can lead to grievances and possible complaints of constructive dismissal.”

Issue: 7648 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll