header-logo header-logo

Obesity ruling no “game changer”

06 August 2014
Issue: 7616 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

An Advocate General’s Opinion that obesity can be classed as a disability under EU law is “not a game changer”, a leading employment lawyer has said.

Delivering his Opinion in Kaltoft v Kommunernes Landsforening, acting on behalf of the Municipality of Billund C-354/13 at the European Court of Justice (ECJ), AG Jääskinen said that morbid obesity could come within the meaning of “disability” if “it is of such a degree as to hinder full participation in professional life on an equal footing with other employees”. Therefore, only obesity severe enough to cause problems with mobility, stamina or mood would amount to disability.

Makbool Javaid, employment partner at Simons, Muirhead & Burton, says: “A lot of unrealistic publicity has surrounded this case, frightening people into thinking that the result could mean that ‘obesity’ in itself would be declared a disability in its own right...If the ECJ rules as I suspect it will, given the previous judgments, then there really should be no surprises when its definition is applied in UK law—yes, obese people could be protected but it depends on the facts and critically whether the person has a physical or mental impairment.”

Issue: 7616 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll