header-logo header-logo

06 August 2014
Issue: 7616 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Obesity ruling no “game changer”

An Advocate General’s Opinion that obesity can be classed as a disability under EU law is “not a game changer”, a leading employment lawyer has said.

Delivering his Opinion in Kaltoft v Kommunernes Landsforening, acting on behalf of the Municipality of Billund C-354/13 at the European Court of Justice (ECJ), AG Jääskinen said that morbid obesity could come within the meaning of “disability” if “it is of such a degree as to hinder full participation in professional life on an equal footing with other employees”. Therefore, only obesity severe enough to cause problems with mobility, stamina or mood would amount to disability.

Makbool Javaid, employment partner at Simons, Muirhead & Burton, says: “A lot of unrealistic publicity has surrounded this case, frightening people into thinking that the result could mean that ‘obesity’ in itself would be declared a disability in its own right...If the ECJ rules as I suspect it will, given the previous judgments, then there really should be no surprises when its definition is applied in UK law—yes, obese people could be protected but it depends on the facts and critically whether the person has a physical or mental impairment.”

Issue: 7616 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll