header-logo header-logo

Obesity ruling no “game changer”

06 August 2014
Issue: 7616 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

An Advocate General’s Opinion that obesity can be classed as a disability under EU law is “not a game changer”, a leading employment lawyer has said.

Delivering his Opinion in Kaltoft v Kommunernes Landsforening, acting on behalf of the Municipality of Billund C-354/13 at the European Court of Justice (ECJ), AG Jääskinen said that morbid obesity could come within the meaning of “disability” if “it is of such a degree as to hinder full participation in professional life on an equal footing with other employees”. Therefore, only obesity severe enough to cause problems with mobility, stamina or mood would amount to disability.

Makbool Javaid, employment partner at Simons, Muirhead & Burton, says: “A lot of unrealistic publicity has surrounded this case, frightening people into thinking that the result could mean that ‘obesity’ in itself would be declared a disability in its own right...If the ECJ rules as I suspect it will, given the previous judgments, then there really should be no surprises when its definition is applied in UK law—yes, obese people could be protected but it depends on the facts and critically whether the person has a physical or mental impairment.”

Issue: 7616 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll