header-logo header-logo

14 February 2025 / Charles Davey
Issue: 8104 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Privacy , Disclosure , Health
printer mail-detail

Off the record

208117
Solicitors & courts are often indifferent to claimants’ rights to confidentiality, writes Charles Davey, setting out a blueprint for change to the disclosure rules
  • Trial bundles often include disclosure of the entirety of personal injury claimants’ medical records. In modest claims, this is unnecessary and inappropriate.
  • These records often relate to personal, sensitive and irrelevant details, and disclosure could be in breach of claimants’ right to privacy.
  • This article proposes that the Civil Procedure Rule Committee should provide a structure for disclosure in these claims.

In modest personal injury claims, routine, unnecessary and inappropriate disclosure of the entirety of claimants’ medical records is not acceptable. This is in clear violation of a solicitor’s duty of confidentiality and a potential breach of claimants’ rights under Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, not to mention possible breaches of data protection legislation. To make matters worse, these records are frequently included in trial bundles.

In a claim for damages for life-changing injuries, with a substantial claim for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll