header-logo header-logo

Old colonies; new disputes

12 June 2015 / James Brockhurst
Issue: 7656 / Categories: Features , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Can the UK force its modern-day “colonies” to introduce registers of beneficial ownership, asks James Brockhurst

A bitter debate has been simmering between the UK and the British overseas territories regarding the proposed introduction of registers of beneficial ownership. The proposal is that each overseas territory should create a public register which will document the ‘real’ ownership of shareholders of every company registered within its borders. Although this article focuses on the legal position concerning the overseas territories, the matter is also relevant to the UK’s Crown dependencies.

This development will have wide-reaching practical implications for company, finance and private client lawyers in the UK and beyond.

The UK Parliament is legislating to introduce such registers in the UK under the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015. Alongside its own legislation, the UK is making rigorous demands that the overseas territories follow suit and introduce their own internal registers.

The UK government and its G8 partners believe that beneficial ownership registers will help combat cross-border tax avoidance and evasion. With this electorally

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll