header-logo header-logo

12 June 2015 / James Brockhurst
Issue: 7656 / Categories: Features , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Old colonies; new disputes

Can the UK force its modern-day “colonies” to introduce registers of beneficial ownership, asks James Brockhurst

A bitter debate has been simmering between the UK and the British overseas territories regarding the proposed introduction of registers of beneficial ownership. The proposal is that each overseas territory should create a public register which will document the ‘real’ ownership of shareholders of every company registered within its borders. Although this article focuses on the legal position concerning the overseas territories, the matter is also relevant to the UK’s Crown dependencies.

This development will have wide-reaching practical implications for company, finance and private client lawyers in the UK and beyond.

The UK Parliament is legislating to introduce such registers in the UK under the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015. Alongside its own legislation, the UK is making rigorous demands that the overseas territories follow suit and introduce their own internal registers.

The UK government and its G8 partners believe that beneficial ownership registers will help combat cross-border tax avoidance and evasion. With this electorally

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
Businesses are facing a ‘dramatic rise in prosecution risks’ as sweeping reforms to corporate criminal liability come into force, expanding the net of who can be held responsible for wrongdoing inside organisations
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
back-to-top-scroll