header-logo header-logo

Old colonies; new disputes

12 June 2015 / James Brockhurst
Issue: 7656 / Categories: Features , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Can the UK force its modern-day “colonies” to introduce registers of beneficial ownership, asks James Brockhurst

A bitter debate has been simmering between the UK and the British overseas territories regarding the proposed introduction of registers of beneficial ownership. The proposal is that each overseas territory should create a public register which will document the ‘real’ ownership of shareholders of every company registered within its borders. Although this article focuses on the legal position concerning the overseas territories, the matter is also relevant to the UK’s Crown dependencies.

This development will have wide-reaching practical implications for company, finance and private client lawyers in the UK and beyond.

The UK Parliament is legislating to introduce such registers in the UK under the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015. Alongside its own legislation, the UK is making rigorous demands that the overseas territories follow suit and introduce their own internal registers.

The UK government and its G8 partners believe that beneficial ownership registers will help combat cross-border tax avoidance and evasion. With this electorally

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll