header-logo header-logo

12 June 2015 / James Brockhurst
Issue: 7656 / Categories: Features , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Old colonies; new disputes

Can the UK force its modern-day “colonies” to introduce registers of beneficial ownership, asks James Brockhurst

A bitter debate has been simmering between the UK and the British overseas territories regarding the proposed introduction of registers of beneficial ownership. The proposal is that each overseas territory should create a public register which will document the ‘real’ ownership of shareholders of every company registered within its borders. Although this article focuses on the legal position concerning the overseas territories, the matter is also relevant to the UK’s Crown dependencies.

This development will have wide-reaching practical implications for company, finance and private client lawyers in the UK and beyond.

The UK Parliament is legislating to introduce such registers in the UK under the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015. Alongside its own legislation, the UK is making rigorous demands that the overseas territories follow suit and introduce their own internal registers.

The UK government and its G8 partners believe that beneficial ownership registers will help combat cross-border tax avoidance and evasion. With this electorally

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Employment boutique strengthens data protection and privacy offering with senior consultant hire

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll