header-logo header-logo

09 May 2019 / Catherine Taskis , Anthony Tanney
Issue: 7839 / Categories: Features , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

Old meets new

Forfeiture: modern issues with an established remedy. Catherine Taskis & Anthony Tanney investigate

  • A landlord seeking to forfeit a lease must ensure that his right to do so has arisen under the terms of the lease and that he does nothing to waive that right before he can exercise it.

Almost all modern leases provide that if the tenant is in arrears of rent, or fails to perform his covenants in the lease, the landlord may re-enter and bring the lease to an end by forfeiture. But the courts have traditionally ‘leaned against’ forfeiture, viewing a landlord’s right of re-entry as simply a security for performance of the tenant’s obligations, rather than a means for the landlord to get the premises back. The best-known aspect of this approach is the court’s extensive jurisdiction to grant the tenant relief against forfeiture, on condition that he makes good his defaults. But the courts will also closely scrutinise whether the landlord is properly entitled to forfeit the lease in the first place, as two recent cases show.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Employment boutique strengthens data protection and privacy offering with senior consultant hire

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll