header-logo header-logo

Olympic-standard rights protection

09 August 2024 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 8083 / Categories: Features , Sports law , Sports litigation , Copyright
printer mail-detail
185043
Not only the athletes but the lawyers should win a gold medal, writes Athelstane Aamodt

As nearly all NLJ readers will be aware, the Olympic Games were opened on 26 July. The Games in Paris are their 33rd iteration, in which 329 events in 32 sports have taken place. It is a global event par excellence.

The organisation (and indeed the cost) of the Olympics is on the most gigantic scale. The more interesting aspects of the Games are the intellectual property of the Olympic movement, the origins of it, and the zealousness with which those rights are protected.

The rings

The famous interlocking rings emblem of the Olympic Games was created in 1913 by Pierre de Coubertin (1863-1937), the co-founder of the International Olympic Committee (the IOC). It is a masterpiece of restrained simplicity, much like the Japanese national flag or the Mastercard logo. The five rings were intended to represent the five inhabited continents of the world, and the colours of those rings were intended to reproduce the colours contained

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School and the Frenkel Topping Group—AKA The insider—crowns Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP as his case of 2025 in his latest column for NLJ. The High Court’s decision—that non-authorised employees cannot conduct litigation, even under supervision—has sent shockwaves through the profession. Regan calls it the year’s defining moment for civil practitioners and reproduces a ‘cut-out-and-keep’ summary of key rulings from Mr Justice Sheldon
back-to-top-scroll