header-logo header-logo

09 August 2024 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 8083 / Categories: Features , Sports law , Sports litigation , Copyright
printer mail-detail

Olympic-standard rights protection

185043
Not only the athletes but the lawyers should win a gold medal, writes Athelstane Aamodt

As nearly all NLJ readers will be aware, the Olympic Games were opened on 26 July. The Games in Paris are their 33rd iteration, in which 329 events in 32 sports have taken place. It is a global event par excellence.

The organisation (and indeed the cost) of the Olympics is on the most gigantic scale. The more interesting aspects of the Games are the intellectual property of the Olympic movement, the origins of it, and the zealousness with which those rights are protected.

The rings

The famous interlocking rings emblem of the Olympic Games was created in 1913 by Pierre de Coubertin (1863-1937), the co-founder of the International Olympic Committee (the IOC). It is a masterpiece of restrained simplicity, much like the Japanese national flag or the Mastercard logo. The five rings were intended to represent the five inhabited continents of the world, and the colours of those rings were intended to reproduce the colours contained

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll