header-logo header-logo

04 November 2020 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7909 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

On parole & under review

30960
Jon Robins reports on the inevitable decision to review the Parole system

It was revealed last month that the Parole Board will be the subject of a ‘root and branch’ review potentially opening up hearings to victims of crime as well as members of the press (bit.ly/3mO6Jfn). Is this a win for advocates of open justice or a rather shabby knee jerk response of a government pandering to the baser instincts of the tabloid press?

Brian Lea of Nottingham didn’t need much persuading. ‘The stuffy, almost ignorant people on the Parole Board should have been put out to grass years ago,’ he wrote in the letters page of The Sun last week. ‘Let’s hope it’s not replaced by something even more stupid.’ It’s a bit harsh on the judges, psychologists, psychiatrists, probation officers as well as lay members who typically comprise parole boards.

Reform of the parole system has been inevitable since the furore over the initial decision to back the release of the so called ‘black-cab rapist’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll