header-logo header-logo

04 November 2020 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7909 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

On parole & under review

30960
Jon Robins reports on the inevitable decision to review the Parole system

It was revealed last month that the Parole Board will be the subject of a ‘root and branch’ review potentially opening up hearings to victims of crime as well as members of the press (bit.ly/3mO6Jfn). Is this a win for advocates of open justice or a rather shabby knee jerk response of a government pandering to the baser instincts of the tabloid press?

Brian Lea of Nottingham didn’t need much persuading. ‘The stuffy, almost ignorant people on the Parole Board should have been put out to grass years ago,’ he wrote in the letters page of The Sun last week. ‘Let’s hope it’s not replaced by something even more stupid.’ It’s a bit harsh on the judges, psychologists, psychiatrists, probation officers as well as lay members who typically comprise parole boards.

Reform of the parole system has been inevitable since the furore over the initial decision to back the release of the so called ‘black-cab rapist’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll