header-logo header-logo

09 September 2010 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7432 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

One child—two mothers

Michael Tringham reports on the story behind a HK$10m intestacy

The Hong Kong justice system has, King Solomon-like, decided between two mothers claiming the same son. At stake: the HK$10 million (£1m) intestate estate of 51-year old Hong Kong GP and childless widower Dr Tsang, who died suddenly of heart disease in 2001 without a will.

Two women, both in their 70s, claimed to be the deceased’s mother in a bitter five-year drama fought from Hong Kong’s High Court to the Final Court of Appeal. Final victory went to Dr Tsang’s natural mother, Mdm L F Leung—or rather, her estate, the lady having died between the High Court and Final Appeal Court hearings. She had borne him during her 1947-1958 marriage to Mr Tsang Senior.

Her adversary, Mdm S Y Ho, asserted her claim as Dr Tsang’s legal mother. A former schoolmate of Mr Tsang Senior, she became his “official” concubine in 1952, a union solemnised under Chinese customary law by kowtowing and tea ceremonies—to which, Mdm Ho told the High Court, Mdm Leung

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll