header-logo header-logo

Online courts take the stage

19 May 2017 / Claire Pennells , Masood Ahmed
Issue: 7746 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-detail
nlj_7746_masood

Masood Ahmed & Claire Pennells consider pre-action protocols & the Briggs online court

The Lord Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls commissioned Lord Justice Briggs to review the civil dispute resolution structure in England and Wales in order to increase access to justice. Although Briggs LJ’s review, known as the Civil Court Structure Review (Interim and Final Reports), considered a wide range of matters, his single most radical proposal was the introduction of an online court (OC) to handle more modest disputes. In Briggs LJ’s estimation, according to his Interim Report , the OC ‘offers the best available prospect of providing access to justice for people and small businesses of ordinary financial resources’. Although the forthcoming general election has meant that the Prisons and Courts Bill, which seeks to implement some of these key reforms (including the formation of a new online procedural rule committee), has been dropped, work on structuring and piloting aspects of the OC continues.

One of the distinguishing features of Briggs LJ’s proposed OC

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll