header-logo header-logo

19 May 2017 / Claire Pennells , Masood Ahmed
Issue: 7746 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-detail

Online courts take the stage

nlj_7746_masood

Masood Ahmed & Claire Pennells consider pre-action protocols & the Briggs online court

The Lord Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls commissioned Lord Justice Briggs to review the civil dispute resolution structure in England and Wales in order to increase access to justice. Although Briggs LJ’s review, known as the Civil Court Structure Review (Interim and Final Reports), considered a wide range of matters, his single most radical proposal was the introduction of an online court (OC) to handle more modest disputes. In Briggs LJ’s estimation, according to his Interim Report , the OC ‘offers the best available prospect of providing access to justice for people and small businesses of ordinary financial resources’. Although the forthcoming general election has meant that the Prisons and Courts Bill, which seeks to implement some of these key reforms (including the formation of a new online procedural rule committee), has been dropped, work on structuring and piloting aspects of the OC continues.

One of the distinguishing features of Briggs LJ’s proposed OC

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll