header-logo header-logo

Online wills storing up trouble?

28 October 2021
Issue: 7954 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Wills & Probate , Technology
printer mail-detail
Increased use of simple online wills could lead to a surge in unsuitable and contested wills, a funeral research and consultancy firm has predicted

In a report published last week, Funeral Solution Expert revealed its research, using nationally representative surveys among UK consumers, had uncovered ‘fundamental problems’, with wills too simplistic for many people’s circumstances. The will writers did not always ask sufficient questions to determine if a ‘simple’ will is suitable for an individual’s circumstances or provide clear warnings of the risks involved. Moreover, nearly a quarter (23%) of consumers did not read or understand the terms of the will they signed.

In particular, the report highlighted that online will writers are unregulated and offer little liability for anything going wrong, which means bereaved families would have nowhere to complain and no legal right to any compensation. 

Online wills have surged in the past year, fuelled by the pandemic.

Factors that could make a person’s affairs complex include marital status, children from previous relationships, assets held, business ownership and self-employment, overseas property and intention to disinherit a family member. However, the analysis found some will writers only asked three or four simple qualifying questions and did not check the customer’s mental capacity to make the will. This problem was exacerbated by the fact 65% of customers who claimed to have simple affairs actually had complex affairs.

Michael Culver, chair of Solicitors for the Elderly, said: ‘It’s shocking that while solicitors are required to have professional indemnity insurance covering claims potentially as high as £2m or £3m (and many firms go for optional additional cover that can take this as high as £10m per claim), other professionals offering wills limit their liability to the cost of the will. £200 compensation doesn’t seem sufficient to cover a mistake that could end up costing someone their entire estate or inheritance.’

Issue: 7954 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Wills & Probate , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll