header-logo header-logo

28 October 2021
Issue: 7954 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Wills & Probate , Technology
printer mail-detail

Online wills storing up trouble?

Increased use of simple online wills could lead to a surge in unsuitable and contested wills, a funeral research and consultancy firm has predicted

In a report published last week, Funeral Solution Expert revealed its research, using nationally representative surveys among UK consumers, had uncovered ‘fundamental problems’, with wills too simplistic for many people’s circumstances. The will writers did not always ask sufficient questions to determine if a ‘simple’ will is suitable for an individual’s circumstances or provide clear warnings of the risks involved. Moreover, nearly a quarter (23%) of consumers did not read or understand the terms of the will they signed.

In particular, the report highlighted that online will writers are unregulated and offer little liability for anything going wrong, which means bereaved families would have nowhere to complain and no legal right to any compensation. 

Online wills have surged in the past year, fuelled by the pandemic.

Factors that could make a person’s affairs complex include marital status, children from previous relationships, assets held, business ownership and self-employment, overseas property and intention to disinherit a family member. However, the analysis found some will writers only asked three or four simple qualifying questions and did not check the customer’s mental capacity to make the will. This problem was exacerbated by the fact 65% of customers who claimed to have simple affairs actually had complex affairs.

Michael Culver, chair of Solicitors for the Elderly, said: ‘It’s shocking that while solicitors are required to have professional indemnity insurance covering claims potentially as high as £2m or £3m (and many firms go for optional additional cover that can take this as high as £10m per claim), other professionals offering wills limit their liability to the cost of the will. £200 compensation doesn’t seem sufficient to cover a mistake that could end up costing someone their entire estate or inheritance.’

Issue: 7954 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Wills & Probate , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll