header-logo header-logo

Open all hours?

03 October 2019 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7858 / Categories: Features , Public , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
7238
Nicholas Dobson discusses open justice & access to court documents
  • Unless inconsistent with statute or the rules of court, all courts and tribunals have an inherent jurisdiction to determine what open justice requires for access to documents or other information before them.
  • However, those seeking access must explain why it is sought, how granting it will advance open justice and address any countervailing factors.

The Irish judge Sir James Matthew (1830–1908), once remarked that ‘justice is open to all—like the Ritz Hotel’. In other words, ‘it is and it isn’t’. But what about the current position on open justice and access to court documents by non-parties? Who can access these and when? Fortunately, the Supreme Court addressed these issues on 29 July 2019 in Cape Intermediate Holdings Ltd v Dring (on behalf of Asbestos Victims Support Groups Forum UK) [2019] UKSC 38, [2019] All ER (D) 161 (Jul). Lady Hale gave the judgment of the court on behalf of herself and her colleagues: Lords Briggs, Kitchin and Sales and Lady Arden.

Background

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll