header-logo header-logo

03 June 2010 / Maria Kell , Katharine Davies
Issue: 7420 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Open all hours...

Katharine Davies & Maria Kell provide a timely guide to the 24/7 Electronic Working Scheme

High Court litigators in London are surely delighted that, since April, they have been released from the tyranny of court opening hours. Limitation issues and bank holidays are no longer nightmares that haunt every trainee.

You can now issue a claim electronically 24/7, 365 days a year in the following courts:

  • Commercial (& Admiralty & London Mercantile Courts);
  • Technology & Construction (TCC);
  • Chancery Division, Patents Court & Bankruptcy & Companies Courts (although not yet in the county courts).

This change has been effected by Practice Direction (PD) 5C, which supplements CPR Rules 5.5 and 7.12, and which came into force on 1 April 2010 (replacing the earlier PD in force on 1 April 2009 which supported the Electronic Working Pilot Scheme). This document contains all the official guidance on how to start a claim electronically, how to make a request for judgment or issue of a warrant, how to inspect the case record, how to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll