header-logo header-logo

12 June 2026 / Jeffrey Wale
Issue: 8165 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Open justice & unwanted consequences

252178
© Getty images
Ministry of Justice: Careful evaluation needed

Dr Jeffrey Wale shares his concerns about the non-party document access pilot

The Transparency and Open Justice Board (TOJB), introduced by the Lady Chief Justice in April 2024, has now crystallised its key objectives for delivering open justice. These objectives develop three broad themes. First, courts and tribunals should promote open justice to enable the public to understand and scrutinise the administration of justice; and thereby seek to uphold public confidence and support improved public understanding of their constitutional role. Second, the principles of transparency and open justice generally require the proceedings and decisions of courts and tribunals to be open and accessible to everyone, supporting and promoting the reporting of proceedings and any related decisions. There are practical issues about how this second objective is delivered, but as a starting point, it would include granting non-parties access to relevant court documents. Third, open justice involves a default position that is subject to certain derogations imposed by statute—for example, certain types of reporting restriction. Where derogations from open justice are granted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll