header-logo header-logo

Open secrets

04 November 2010 / Claire Sanders
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Features , Family , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Claire Sanders reports on the sensitivities of disclosure in forced marriage cases

Two recent cases concerning forced marriage protection orders (FMPOs), both heard by Sir Nicholas Wall, the president of the Family Division, highlight some of the difficulties faced by the courts and the parties in forced marriage or “honour” based violence cases.

Under the Forced Marriage Protection (Civil Protection) Act 2007 (FM(CO)A 2007) circumstances may arise in which the disclosure of sensitive information is likely to lead to the risk of serious harm to the giver or source of the information.

Issues arise as to how the court can achieve a fair hearing that complies with the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), Art 6 if parts of the evidence necessary for parties to know in order to enable them to meet allegations made against them cannot safely be revealed to them on the ground that disclosure of the information or its source is likely to identify the informant and thus place them at risk.

The issue of disclosure may be particularly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll