header-logo header-logo

04 November 2010 / Claire Sanders
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Features , Family , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Open secrets

Claire Sanders reports on the sensitivities of disclosure in forced marriage cases

Two recent cases concerning forced marriage protection orders (FMPOs), both heard by Sir Nicholas Wall, the president of the Family Division, highlight some of the difficulties faced by the courts and the parties in forced marriage or “honour” based violence cases.

Under the Forced Marriage Protection (Civil Protection) Act 2007 (FM(CO)A 2007) circumstances may arise in which the disclosure of sensitive information is likely to lead to the risk of serious harm to the giver or source of the information.

Issues arise as to how the court can achieve a fair hearing that complies with the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), Art 6 if parts of the evidence necessary for parties to know in order to enable them to meet allegations made against them cannot safely be revealed to them on the ground that disclosure of the information or its source is likely to identify the informant and thus place them at risk.

The issue of disclosure may be particularly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll