header-logo header-logo

19 October 2012 / Heather Beckett
Issue: 7534 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Open wide

Heather Beckett highlights the complexities of dental injuries & medical reporting agencies

The increase in personal injury claims which invariably accompanies an economic downturn has proved the age-old adage that it is an ill wind that blows nobody any good. However, in order to minimise costs in relatively low-value claims, high volume, no-win, no-fee solicitors’ firms are increasingly turning to medical reporting agencies (MRAs) to administer the sourcing of records together with the practical aspects of expert instruction and necessary provision of reports.

While this may work for a great proportion of run of the mill slip and trip injuries, there are some differences between medicine and dentistry which mean that this approach often needs to be adapted. One of the most significant is that records differ. There are also differences between, for instance, bones and teeth in the way they heal following injury. This can mean that prognosis following a dental injury is far from straightforward. When it is also realised that teeth ravaged by dental disease may have been repaired by techniques which themselves

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll