header-logo header-logo

19 October 2012 / Heather Beckett
Issue: 7534 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Open wide

Heather Beckett highlights the complexities of dental injuries & medical reporting agencies

The increase in personal injury claims which invariably accompanies an economic downturn has proved the age-old adage that it is an ill wind that blows nobody any good. However, in order to minimise costs in relatively low-value claims, high volume, no-win, no-fee solicitors’ firms are increasingly turning to medical reporting agencies (MRAs) to administer the sourcing of records together with the practical aspects of expert instruction and necessary provision of reports.

While this may work for a great proportion of run of the mill slip and trip injuries, there are some differences between medicine and dentistry which mean that this approach often needs to be adapted. One of the most significant is that records differ. There are also differences between, for instance, bones and teeth in the way they heal following injury. This can mean that prognosis following a dental injury is far from straightforward. When it is also realised that teeth ravaged by dental disease may have been repaired by techniques which themselves

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll