header-logo header-logo

Open wide

19 October 2012 / Heather Beckett
Issue: 7534 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Heather Beckett highlights the complexities of dental injuries & medical reporting agencies

The increase in personal injury claims which invariably accompanies an economic downturn has proved the age-old adage that it is an ill wind that blows nobody any good. However, in order to minimise costs in relatively low-value claims, high volume, no-win, no-fee solicitors’ firms are increasingly turning to medical reporting agencies (MRAs) to administer the sourcing of records together with the practical aspects of expert instruction and necessary provision of reports.

While this may work for a great proportion of run of the mill slip and trip injuries, there are some differences between medicine and dentistry which mean that this approach often needs to be adapted. One of the most significant is that records differ. There are also differences between, for instance, bones and teeth in the way they heal following injury. This can mean that prognosis following a dental injury is far from straightforward. When it is also realised that teeth ravaged by dental disease may have been repaired by techniques which themselves

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll