header-logo header-logo

19 April 2012 / Dr Ann Brady
Issue: 7510 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Operation green light

Dr Ann Brady welcomes the government’s mediation proposals

The government has now produced its response to the consultation Solving disputes in the county courts; creating a simpler, quicker and more proportionate system. Questions 31-37 of the consultation gave those involved with mediation practice both inside and outside the courts the opportunity to give their views. These questions ranged from whether the Civil Mediation Council’s (CMC) accreditation scheme for mediation services providers (providers) was sufficient, whether automatic referral to mediation in small claims cases should be introduced and whether, if the small claims financial threshold was raised, automatic mediation should apply to these new levels too They were also asked to suggest how small claims mediation should be provided and whether they considered that any cases should be exempt from automatic referral to mediation process. The implementation proposals can be found at www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm82/8274/8274.pdf.

It is perhaps useful to point out initially how the system currently works. Judges use case law when considering whether or not it is appropriate to refer a case

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll