header-logo header-logo

Opt-out still alive despite early setbacks

19 January 2018 / Chris Owen
Issue: 7777 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
nlj_7777_owen

It’s been one problem after another so far, but Chris Owen remains optimistic about the future for collective redress

  • The Consumer Rights Act 2015 introduced opt-out class actions for competition claims.
  • Initial optimism wavered as the first cases hit the stumbling blocks. But the CAT has shown willingness to accept these claims in principle, meaning there is hope for funders and claimant representatives alike.
  • It is only a matter of time before a large-scale class claim gets out of the gates.

The Consumer Rights Act 2015 heralded a new era for collective redress in the UK for competition infringements, introducing an opt-out class action regime for competition damages claims. Although opt-out actions have existed in the US for many years, this was the first of its kind within the UK (and indeed a first across the whole of Europe).

It marked a major step forward from what had gone before. The preceding opt-in regime, in which claimants had to self-select to join the litigation, had proved a damp squib (only

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll