header-logo header-logo

Opt-out still alive despite early setbacks

19 January 2018 / Chris Owen
Issue: 7777 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
nlj_7777_owen

It’s been one problem after another so far, but Chris Owen remains optimistic about the future for collective redress

  • The Consumer Rights Act 2015 introduced opt-out class actions for competition claims.
  • Initial optimism wavered as the first cases hit the stumbling blocks. But the CAT has shown willingness to accept these claims in principle, meaning there is hope for funders and claimant representatives alike.
  • It is only a matter of time before a large-scale class claim gets out of the gates.

The Consumer Rights Act 2015 heralded a new era for collective redress in the UK for competition infringements, introducing an opt-out class action regime for competition damages claims. Although opt-out actions have existed in the US for many years, this was the first of its kind within the UK (and indeed a first across the whole of Europe).

It marked a major step forward from what had gone before. The preceding opt-in regime, in which claimants had to self-select to join the litigation, had proved a damp squib (only

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll