header-logo header-logo

Our unwritten constitution: under pressure & under scrutiny

03 October 2019 / David Greene
Issue: 7858 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
Codifying the UK’s constitution to fill in the gaps is up for debate but seems politically unlikely, says David Greene

The opening of the legal year attracts lawyers from all over the world to London. There is much talk among them on the rule of law. At the service in Westminster Abbey this week, even the sermon talked about the rule of law in the context of Brexit.

Britain is hardly alone in experiencing rule of law issues. Even in the most secure constitutions, there are dynamics between the pillars of the constitution, government and Parliament, and government and the courts: such is the stuff of a living constitution.

Our constitution is marked with the common law in that it is largely unwritten; it is uncodified but is reflected in historic constitutional documents such as Magna Carta and the Bill of Rights and more modern constitutional legislation like the European Communities Act 1972 or the Human Rights Act 1998. In addition, the common law and the constitution

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll