header-logo header-logo

03 October 2019 / David Greene
Issue: 7858 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Our unwritten constitution: under pressure & under scrutiny

Codifying the UK’s constitution to fill in the gaps is up for debate but seems politically unlikely, says David Greene

The opening of the legal year attracts lawyers from all over the world to London. There is much talk among them on the rule of law. At the service in Westminster Abbey this week, even the sermon talked about the rule of law in the context of Brexit.

Britain is hardly alone in experiencing rule of law issues. Even in the most secure constitutions, there are dynamics between the pillars of the constitution, government and Parliament, and government and the courts: such is the stuff of a living constitution.

Our constitution is marked with the common law in that it is largely unwritten; it is uncodified but is reflected in historic constitutional documents such as Magna Carta and the Bill of Rights and more modern constitutional legislation like the European Communities Act 1972 or the Human Rights Act 1998. In addition, the common law and the constitution

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll