header-logo header-logo

24 February 2011 / Malcolm Skinner
Issue: 7454 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Out with the old?

Court of Protection Rules—a new start, asks Malcolm Skinner

The Court of Protection Rules Committee (set up in December 2009 to undertake a review of the 2007 Rules and the practice and directions that supplemented them) reported on 29 July 2010 and its recommendations were accepted by the president of the Court of Protection. The proposals were directed at speeding up the processes and making the non-contentious cases that came before the court less time-consuming and easier to conclude.

There were five main recommendations, essentially dealing with the practice and procedure of the court. It was accepted that the setting up of the new court by the Mental Capacity Act 2005 was a radical departure from the old jurisdiction arrangements where the patient’s property and affairs were dealt with by the old Court of Protection and their health and welfare by the High Court.

The divergence of practice and procedure between the courts was understandable but did not sit easily with either the transfer of the issues of both property and welfare to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll