header-logo header-logo

24 February 2011 / Malcolm Skinner
Issue: 7454 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Out with the old?

Court of Protection Rules—a new start, asks Malcolm Skinner

The Court of Protection Rules Committee (set up in December 2009 to undertake a review of the 2007 Rules and the practice and directions that supplemented them) reported on 29 July 2010 and its recommendations were accepted by the president of the Court of Protection. The proposals were directed at speeding up the processes and making the non-contentious cases that came before the court less time-consuming and easier to conclude.

There were five main recommendations, essentially dealing with the practice and procedure of the court. It was accepted that the setting up of the new court by the Mental Capacity Act 2005 was a radical departure from the old jurisdiction arrangements where the patient’s property and affairs were dealt with by the old Court of Protection and their health and welfare by the High Court.

The divergence of practice and procedure between the courts was understandable but did not sit easily with either the transfer of the issues of both property and welfare to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll