header-logo header-logo

16 October 2014 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7626 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Out with the old

salon

Mark Solon outlines the new guidance for experts in civil claims

The purpose of the new guidance published by the Civil Justice Council (CJC) is to assist litigators and those instructing experts and experts to understand best practice in complying with Pt 35 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The guidance will replace the Protocol for the Instruction of Experts in Civil Claims 2007. There are 92 clauses in the guidance and the main areas covered are listed in the text box. It is worth reading the whole document here but here are some points to note.

The new guidance emphasises the established principles that the expert should be independent and owes his primary duty to the court and not the instructing party. Experts must provide opinions that are independent regardless of the pressure of litigation. The guidance uses the following test for independence: that the expert should express the same opinion if given the same instructions by another party but should not promote the views of the instructing party.

Proportionality

The principles

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll