header-logo header-logo

19 October 2012 / Ruth Brander
Issue: 7534 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Out of order?

hires_4_4

Is our right to protest under threat, asks Ruth Brander

In the fifth of a series of articles specially commissioned to mark the 75th anniversary of Atkin’s Court Forms, Ruth Brander, a barrister & contributor to Atkin’s Court Forms, considers recent cases on the law of protest.

Britain’s summer in the spotlight has been hailed as a triumph, with both the Diamond Jubilee celebrations and the Olympic and Paralympic Games passing off “trouble-free”. But what has been the cost in terms of freedom of expression and the right to protest?

As Danny Boyle’s Olympic opening ceremony celebrated Britain’s traditions of diversity, innovation, creativity and humour, outside the stadium, 182 cyclists were being kettled and then arrested for participating in “Critical Mass”—a monthly mass cycle ride through central London, open to all, and with no pre-determined route. On the evening of 27 July 2012, despite Critical Mass having taken place monthly since 1994 without significant threat to public order, the Metropolitan Police sought to impose conditions under s 12 of the Public

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll