header-logo header-logo

19 October 2012 / Ruth Brander
Issue: 7534 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Out of order?

hires_4_4

Is our right to protest under threat, asks Ruth Brander

In the fifth of a series of articles specially commissioned to mark the 75th anniversary of Atkin’s Court Forms, Ruth Brander, a barrister & contributor to Atkin’s Court Forms, considers recent cases on the law of protest.

Britain’s summer in the spotlight has been hailed as a triumph, with both the Diamond Jubilee celebrations and the Olympic and Paralympic Games passing off “trouble-free”. But what has been the cost in terms of freedom of expression and the right to protest?

As Danny Boyle’s Olympic opening ceremony celebrated Britain’s traditions of diversity, innovation, creativity and humour, outside the stadium, 182 cyclists were being kettled and then arrested for participating in “Critical Mass”—a monthly mass cycle ride through central London, open to all, and with no pre-determined route. On the evening of 27 July 2012, despite Critical Mass having taken place monthly since 1994 without significant threat to public order, the Metropolitan Police sought to impose conditions under s 12 of the Public

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll