header-logo header-logo

04 November 2010
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Outsourcing rise

Nearly one in six law firms is now outsourcing part of its business functions and demand is likely to rise when new entrants join the legal services market next year.

Some 57% of the top 200 law firms outsource some business functions, mainly technology and administrative services, according to a survey commissioned by DDC Outsourcing Solutions, 38% use specialist companies for their IT functions, and 29% outsource some or all of their typing or copying work.

Law firms cited cost and reputation as the two most important factors when selecting an outsourcing partner. Some 62% of law firm partners taking part in the research said they prefer to outsource within the UK rather than overseas.

“Although this survey only provides a snapshot of a large and complex sector, there was interestingly no direct correlation between the size of law firms and their appetite for outsourcing,” said Mark Smith, commercial director of DDC Outsourcing Solutions.

“In fact, small firms are just as likely to outsource as large practices.”
Smith said he expected demand to rise when new businesses enter the legal market next October under the Legal Services Act reforms.

“Faced with the prospect of increased competition, law firms are under pressure to commoditise their products—especially those seeking to attract outside investment. Those who insist on keeping everything in-house could soon find themselves outgunned on price and service.”

 

Issue: 7440 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll