header-logo header-logo

Overcrowding forces prison reform

18 October 2023
Issue: 8045 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
The government will legislate to create a presumption that sentences of less than 12 months should be suspended, the Lord Chancellor, Alex Chalk has told MPs

Offenders will serve community sentences instead. The announcement marks a 360-degree turn for the government—former Lord Chancellor David Gauke announced a similar policy in 2019 but it was dropped by Boris Johnson’s government before it could be implemented.

Chalk also promised more emphasis in prisons on rehabilitation.

However, these two policies, aimed at minimising disruption to a convicted person’s life, family and job and reducing the likelihood of reoffending, will be tempered by a policy of longer sentences for the most dangerous offenders.

Chalk aims to tackle overcrowding by arranging more prisoner transfer deals so foreign offenders can be returned up to 18 months before they are due to be released.

He will allow the prison service to let inmates out of prison 18 days early with certain conditions attached, such as tagging. This will not apply to anyone serving a life sentence, an extended determinate sentence, or to anyone convicted of a serious violent offence, terrorism or a sex offence, Chalk said this week.

He told MPs he is considering increasing the sentencing discount for offenders who plead guilty at the first opportunity. He also hinted he may take action on the controversial issue of imprisonment for public protection (IPP) sentences, which are indefinite. While IPP sentences were abolished in 2012, Ministry of Justice figures for December 2022 show 2,892 IPP prisoners remained incarcerated. All but 35 of these had passed their tariff date. Chalk called IPP sentences ‘a stain on our justice system’.

Richard Miller, head of justice at the Law Society, said: ‘The government has taken a pragmatic response to the prison crisis which is a complex issue.

‘There are advantages and disadvantages in the measures proposed by the Justice Secretary, and difficult balances to be struck.’

Andrea Coomber KC (Hon), Chief Executive of the Howard League for Penal Reform, said: ‘Two-thirds of prisons in England and Wales are overcrowded, so it makes sense to introduce targeted early release and limit the use of short sentences.’

Issue: 8045 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll