header-logo header-logo

05 October 2011
Issue: 7484 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Own goal for Football Association in TV row

Premier League television rights shaken by European Court of Justice ruling

A pub landlady has won the right to use a foreign satellite decoder to show Premier League matches.

Karen Murphy, a Portsmouth landlady, used a Greek satellite decoder to broadcast the matches. The FA Premier League brought a prosecution under s 297(1) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

Ruling in Murphy v FA Premier League (C-403-08, C-429-08) the European Court of Justice (ECJ) held that the way the Premier League sells its rights, on an exclusive territory-by-territory basis, breaches EU law.

Alex Haffner, senior associate at international law firm SNR Denton, said: “Principles of free movement of goods and services dictate that measures designed specifically to prevent the cross-border trade of equipment used to view broadcasts, in this case, viewing cards enabling access to the Greek broadcasts, are unlawful.

“At the same time, however, the court has held that EU law does not prevent the Premier League from being able to claim copyright in certain aspects of the broadcasts. It also held that their transmission in a pub does constitute a ‘communication to the public’, which requires the authorisation of the rights holder.”

The case will now return to the High Court for a final ruling. If confirmed, UK consumers can lawfully watch Premier League matches by subscribing to cheap satellite feeds from other member states.

According to Stephen Smith, partner at Reynolds Porter Chamberlain, the Premier League and other European rights holders now have four options.

“One option would be for the Premier League to launch its own TV channel to screen games so that it avoids auctioning the rights to other providers to resell,” he said.

“The Premier League could decide to issue licences only for certain EU countries which generate a high level of income for the rights—excluding some countries such as Greece. Issuing non-exclusive licences is one option, but it is unlikely to be favoured by the Premier League because it would dramatically decrease the price that the rights would fetch.

“Issuing a pan-European licence to a single broadcaster is an option, but there are very few broadcasters who would be able to compete for such rights. That means the rights would not fetch such a high price.”

Issue: 7484 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll