header-logo header-logo

05 July 2018
Issue: 7800 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail

Pace of change fuels family delays

Family Court statistics for the first quarter of 2018 reveal a ‘worrying trend’ for delay, a senior solicitor has warned.

Despite the 26-week rule introduced for disposal of care and supervision cases in 2014, the average time taken is now 30 weeks and only 49% of cases were disposed of within the recommended timescale.

Divorce cases are also taking longer to conclude—the average time to Decree Nisi and Decree Absolute was up three weeks, to 27 weeks, and up two weeks, to 51 weeks, respectively. 

Meanwhile, the proportion of cases where neither side had legal representation was 37%, a rise of 20% since the legal aid cuts took effect in 2013. The proportion where both sides were represented dropped by 16% to 19% over the same period.

Jo Edwards, partner at Forsters, said: ‘The reality is that the pace of change is too rapid and the effect of the swathes of court closures there have been in recent years is huge delay in the system.’

Issue: 7800 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll