header-logo header-logo

14 April 2016
Issue: 7694 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Panama Papers: the fallout

How will the revelations resulting from the Mossack Fonseca leak impact lawyers?

The Panama Papers leak could lead to “a flurry of tax and crime investigations” and, ultimately, work for civil and crime litigators, a senior litigation lawyer has predicted.

About 11.5 million client files were leaked from Panamanian law firm, Mossack Fonseca. Public indignation about secretive tax avoidance schemes followed.

Writing in NLJ this week, David Greene, NLJ consultant editor and senior partner at Edwin Coe, considers the consequences of the Panama revelations for lawyers: “First, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), getting in on the act, has called on lawyers named in the Panama papers to ensure they have acted lawfully. Second, [HMRC] are likely to highlight avoidance schemes and seek to set them aside. Third, judges caught up in the moral maelstrom are likely to be more sympathetic to [HMRC’s] position declaring schemes unlawful.

“Fourth, the Panama disclosures will now be pored over by the Police and Revenue and lead to a flurry of tax and crime investigations. Civil and crime litigators will get busy again.”

The SRA has written to law firms identified in the media as being linked to the Panama Papers to ask for assurances that they have looked into the matter and have acted appropriately. The Financial Conduct Authority has also contacted banks to check if they have links to Mossack Fonseca, with a 15 April deadline for responses.

Greene also warns that some tax avoidance schemes, notably film finance avoidance schemes have been “the subject of much litigation and now convictions for conspiracy to defraud the Revenue”.

Mossack Fonseca has published a statement on its website denying any wrongdoing and defending its integrity. It reads: “Recent media reports have portrayed an inaccurate view of the services that we provide and, despite our efforts to correct the record, misrepresented the nature of our work and its role in global financial markets.

“These reports rely on supposition and stereotypes, and play on the public’s lack of familiarity with the work of firms like ours. The unfortunate irony is that the materials on which these reports are based actually show the high standards we operate under.”

Issue: 7694 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll